Wednesday, September 21, 2016


We have to unearth a mother lode of Trump treasure
So why doesn’t the media keep up the pressure?
Americans need to learn more about his finances
Like did this billionaire pay his fair share of taxes?

An IRS audit is a charade behind which Trump hides
He fears that releasing his returns will turn the tide
Why even Trump’s base might be upset to find out
That his wealth, taxes, charity, etc. are all a washout!

Then there is this entire “Putin-y on the Bounty” facet?
Russians holding an uneven cross-section of Trump assets
Why penalize China for decade-old currency manipulation?
It’s not really a problem, more like a Trump exaggeration!

So if he hangs on to his returns with his usual string of lies
Losing an election won’t really hurt the Trump enterprise
But if he ascends to the Oval Office without coming clean
We might as well just let him paint the White House green!  

Now if he offered full disclosure but lost the presidency
Then the Trump brand will surely lose some currency
But if releasing returns is followed by a victory at the polls
God save this nation, as President Trump will be on a roll!

We simply cannot afford to chance it with this great nation
Informed voters can wittingly preempt a Trump administration
By putting country before party, even the Gipper would agree
Be like Bush 41; vote for Hillary Clinton and also save the GOP!

Monday, August 22, 2016

Let Trump Be Trump!

After a six-year hiatus Donald J. Trump has "pulled me back in" into political blogging.  It's not that I don't write any more, but I have been focused more on my day job, where I blog as well.  Nonetheless, over the past 15 months, Trump has provided all sorts of opportunities for us political hacks to chime in.  Thus far, I have resisted, but can't hold out any longer.  So let me jump back in with an ode to Trump that I have titled, "Let Trump Be Trump," which pretty much encapsulates what this means to me.


They’re saying to get over the hump
We must let Trump be Trump
So they added new campaign staff
To control the man’s routine gaffes
But will this make his poll numbers jump?

Kellyanne Conway is a master of spin
Bannon always goes for the chin
Manafort’s style just did not work
As Trump continued to be a jerk
But can this new team make him win?

After they repackaged Trump as Trump
He expressed his first regret on the stump
But without any specific sort of apology
It sounded like the same old tautology
Hillary’s the devil that we need to dump!

Americans are tired of his constant smears
Inciting the worst in us and stoking our fears
What happened to the shining city on a hill?
That Reagan made us aspire to, if you will
Not this apocalypse that Trump says nears!

After all trust is what each one of us earns
Trump must begin by releasing his tax returns
And he must absolutely stop with the name-calling
It’s simply childish, un-presidential and galling
Dignity and decency is what the nation yearns!

So from now until November the eighth 
Pray tell us why America is not already great
We need to hear details in the Trump plan
Debate your differences woman-to-man
And convince the skeptics that it is not too late!

Else Madam President it is going to be
With a likely Democratic Senate majority
She will shape the courts for a generation
In many ways that will transform our nation
And Trump will be Trump—destroyer of the GOP!

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Assuring Victory in Afghanistan

The failed Mayday bombing incident in Times Square exposed the involvement of the Pakistan Taliban in a jihadist plot against the United States. Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, a naturalized American citizen, was apparently distraught over collateral damage caused by Predator drones along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. Increasingly in the past year, disgruntled Pakistani-Americans have made various attempts to avenge for stepped-up drone attacks in the critical AfPak border area. This latest effort – another foiled attack on the homeland – brings a new sense of urgency to our overall mission in the Afghan theater of operations.

A recent New York Times editorial lamented that
“Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan, has a clear military strategy. We are less certain about the administration’s political strategy.”
It should be pretty obvious to anyone that if these two strategies are not in sync, failure is no longer an option, but becomes almost certain. We were experiencing a similar situation in Iraq until late 2006, when Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was fired and the current Defense Secretary Robert Gates took charge. Secretary Gates quickly aligned the Bush Administration’s political strategy namely, to defeat the insurgency and stabilize Iraq, with its military strategy, which was to surge forces with a clear, hold and build objective – and, thus ensured success. Today, the U.S. is on target to withdraw most of its combat troops from Iraq by late summer.

More curiously, the Times editorial appeared to have analyzed the Karzai problem strictly within the confines of Afghanistan, ignoring its larger geopolitical context. Pakistan’s influence on the outcome in Afghanistan is as much, if not more relevant than, what Iran’s influence would have been to the outcome in Iraq without the surge. President Karzai’s weakness is, in part, due to the Pakistani military’s ongoing covert relationship with the Afghan Taliban.

The Obama administration’s political strategy in Afghanistan is thus compounded by the “what do we do about Pakistan” factor? Gen. McChrystal will not be able to effectively clear, hold and build in Afghanistan until President Obama delivers an enforceable ultimatum to the Pakistan military’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency. President Obama should warn the ISI in no uncertain terms to cease and desist from further meddling in Afghanistan – a good start would be to give the Pakistan military a deadline to begin its much-delayed operations in North Waziristan to flush out all of the Al Qaeda and Taliban leadership. Only then, can President Obama seriously expect to achieve his own goal of starting to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan by mid-2011.

Ahmed Rashid, a Pakistani journalist, wrote recently in the Washington Post about the selfsame Pakistan factor. Mr. Rashid’s analysis of the dilemma facing the United States boiled down to “Karzai vs. the ISI.” Even he acknowledged that Pakistan is trying to influence the outcome in Afghanistan to its advantage. The ISI is again hedging dangerously with respect to the Taliban – turning against them at home to satisfy the U.S., but coddling them in Afghanistan to counter the Indians.

The bottom line is just as the “Sunni Awakening” preceded the Iraqi surge, the U.S. needs to feverishly work with Karzai on a “Taliban Awakening” in Afghanistan to guarantee the success of the surge there. The United States cannot let the ISI dictate the terms of its Afghan policy; else it is bound to fail. Pakistan must focus its energies internally to rid itself of a compounding “Jihadi” menace; else it will continue to degenerate into chaos akin to a Somalia of the subcontinent – a situation that would not be beneficial to the world at large. Pakistan must accept the role of the Predator drone in today’s war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban leadership as it did the role of the Stinger missile launcher in yesteryear’s war against the Soviets – as a necessary instrument to drive out foreign fighters from Afghanistan. Only then can Afghanistan achieve a lasting peace with a stable government.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Eight in ’08 – Crude Summer, Black Fall!

I have been unable to post a new blog in the past couple of months due to various commitments. Nonetheless, I discovered eight wonderful commentaries that I had written back in 2008 and posted on the “Syndicated News” web site. They were penned during a sizzling summer, shortly after the price of crude oil hit a record high of $147.27 in July 2008 and during a black fall, when in a single week the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 1,874 points, or 18%, in its worst weekly decline ever on both a point and percentage basis.

Some of these essays on our fragile political, economic and foreign policy landscape at that time, now seem quite prescient, if I might say so myself. I wish mainstream pundits would review their writings from a couple of years ago to see if they had the requisite foresight on some of the pressing issues of the day. As the saying goes, hindsight is 20/20, but it’s foresight that really qualifies you as a pundit. So here are the links to my syndicated efforts from that turbulent period in 2008:

In the War on Terrorism: A Passage Through India (8/14/2008)

Can a new, expanded NATO avert Cold War II? (8/21/2008)

Obama-Biden his time, as McCain-Palin to irrelevance! (9/3/2008)

Victory in Iraq (9/8/2008)

The Great Regression (9/30/2008)

For U.S. Foreign Policy: A "New Clear" Passage Through India (10/20/2008)

The Political Pendulum: Swinging To Liberalism (10/27/2008)

Too Much, Too Little, Too Late From The Fed: We Are All Keynesians Now! (10/30/2008)

So do I qualify as a pundit?